20110310
BBC's "History of Christianity"
*but not perfect. At around the 18:08 mark, the narrator refers to something he calls "Iconoclast Orthodoxy," which, of course, is a contradiction in terms. Then the map shown at 30:40 identifies Carthage as one of the ancient patriarchates. They apparently confused it with Alexandria.
20101206
St Nicholas: He Who Punches Heretics in the Face (and Gives Gifts to Children)
![[nicholas-punches-arius.jpg]](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjCdG_CAkKp3glG-THonQy2um9N43PbFfZtvHn-9vd8z7JmpSuftskLLH33IYRMBIMMxh2wSgicaVwxuoGzui3Eo2LhvJLyWuF9lnTV8-RvTyw_oKgh5kbAkIxSDsbn3fiVZ67hpFhIWcA/s1600/nicholas-punches-arius.jpg)
source
When President Teddy Roosevelt was a college student, he taught a Sunday School class for elementary school children. During this time, Roosevelt awarded a dollar to a boy in his Sunday School class for beating the snot out of a bully who tormented little girls. "You did exactly right," said Roosevelt with pride. However, the congregation disagreed. They immediately dismissed Roosevelt for teaching the "un-Christian" principle of laying the smack down on those who have it coming to them.
Well, if tradition is true, that little boy was also richly rewarded by Jolly Old Saint Nicholas since the good Saint Nick allegedly "h-slapped" ("heretic slapped") the heresiarch Arius. You see, Arius wrongly taught that Christ was not fully divine. Rather, Arius taught that Christ had been created by God the Father.
During the First Ecumenical Council of Nicea (AD 325), Arius was called upon to defend his position on the inferiority of Christ. Saint Nicholas just couldn't listen to all of Arius' nonsense and so he stood up and laid in to Arius with his fist.
The Emperor Constantine and the bishops present at the Council were alarmed by Nicholas' act of violence against Arius. They immediately stripped Nicholas of his office as a bishop by confiscating the two items that marked out a man as a Christian bishop: Nicholas' personal copy of the Gospels and his pallium (the vestment worn by all bishops in the East).
Now if that were the end of the story, we probably wouldn't know about Saint Nicholas, and our children wouldn't be asking him for presents. However, after Nicholas was deposed, the Lord Jesus Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary visited Nicholas who was being held in a prison cell for his fist-fight with the heretic.
Our Lord Jesus Christ asked Saint Nicholas, "Why are you here?" Nicholas responded, "Because I love you, my Lord and my God."
Christ then presented Nicholas with his copy of the Gospels. Next, the Blessed Virgin vested Nicholas with his episcopal pallium, thus restoring him to his rank as a bishop.
20100409
NPR: In Rare Instance, Greek Orthodox Easter Aligns With West
"Well, this is a phenomenon that no one has in recorded history. Usually the dates of Easter either coincide every four years or they're one week behind or two weeks behind, accordingly. But this year and next year, 2011, is a phenomenon of the Easters coming together back to back. And this I think God's speaking to us. Now, if we don't act on this, he's not going to have too much patience with us because it's never going to happen again for 800 years."
Read transcript here
20090531
First Ecumenical Council

The Commemoration of the First Ecumenical Council has been celebrated by the Church of Christ from ancient times. The Lord Jesus Christ left the Church a great promise, "I will build My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it" (Mt. 16:18). Although the Church of Christ on earth will pass through difficult struggles with the Enemy of salvation, it will emerge victorious. The holy martyrs bore witness to the truth of the Savior's words, enduring suffering and death for confessing Christ, but the persecutor's sword is shattered by the Cross of Christ.
Persecution of Christians ceased during the fourth century, but heresies arose within the Church itself. One of the most pernicious of these heresies was Arianism. Arius, a priest of Alexandria, was a man of immense pride and ambition. In denying the divine nature of Jesus Christ and His equality with God the Father, Arius falsely taught that the Savior is not consubstantial with the Father, but is only a created being.
A local Council, convened with Patriarch Alexander of Alexandria presiding, condemned the false teachings of Arius. However, Arius would not submit to the authority of the Church. He wrote to many bishops, denouncing the decrees of the local Council. He spread his false teaching throughout the East, receiving support from certain Eastern bishops.
Investigating these dissentions, the holy emperor Constantine (May 21) consulted Bishop Hosius of Cordova (Aug. 27), who assured him that the heresy of Arius was directed against the most fundamental dogma of Christ's Church, and so he decided to convene an Ecumenical Council. In 325, 318 bishops representing Christian Churches from various lands gathered together at Nicea.
Among the assembled bishops were many confessors who had suffered during the persecutions, and who bore the marks of torture upon their bodies. Also participating in the Council were several great luminaries of the Church: St Nicholas, Archbishop of Myra in Lycia (December 6 and May 9), St Spyridon, Bishop of Tremithos (December 12), and others venerated by the Church as holy Fathers.
With Patriarch Alexander of Alexandria came his deacon, Athanasius (who later became Patriarch of Alexandria (May 2 and January 18). He is called "the Great," for he was a zealous champion for the purity of Orthodoxy. In the Sixth Ode of the Canon for today's Feast, he is referred to as "the thirteenth Apostle."
The emperor Constantine presided over the sessions of the Council. In his speech, responding to the welcome by Bishop Eusebius of Caesarea, he said, "God has helped me cast down the impious might of the persecutors, but more distressful for me than any blood spilled in battle is for a soldier, is the internal strife in the Church of God, for it is more ruinous."
Arius, with seventeen bishops among his supporters, remained arrogant, but his teaching was repudiated and he was excommunicated from the Church. In his speech, the holy deacon Athanasius conclusively refuted the blasphemous opinions of Arius. The heresiarch Arius is depicted in iconography sitting on Satan's knees, or in the mouth of the Beast of the Deep (Rev. 13).
The Fathers of the Council declined to accept a Symbol of Faith (Creed) proposed by the Arians. Instead, they affirmed the Orthodox Symbol of Faith. St Constantine asked the Council to insert into the text of the Symbol of Faith the word "consubstantial," which he had heard in the speeches of the bishops. The Fathers of the Council unanimously accepted this suggestion.
In the Nicean Creed, the holy Fathers set forth and confirmed the Apostolic teachings about Christ's divine nature. The heresy of Arius was exposed and repudiated as an error of haughty reason. After resolving this chief dogmatic question, the Council also issued Twelve Canons on questions of churchly administration and discipline. Also decided was the date for the celebration of Holy Pascha. By decision of the Council, Holy Pascha should not be celebrated by Christians on the same day with the Jewish Passover, but on the first Sunday after the first full moon of the vernal equinox (which occured on March 22 in 325).
(from oca.org)
20090308
Sunday of Orthodoxy
The following is from the Greek Archdiocese:
The Sunday of Orthodoxy is the first Sunday of Great Lent. The dominant theme of this Sunday since 843 has been that of the victory of the icons. In that year the iconoclastic controversy, which had raged on and off since 726, was finally laid to rest, and icons and their veneration were restored on the first Sunday in Lent. Ever since, this Sunday has been commemorated as the "Triumph of Orthodoxy."
Historical Background
The Seventh Ecumenical Council dealt predominantly with the controversy regarding icons and their place in Orthodox worship. It was convened in Nicaea in 787 by Empress Irene at the request of Tarasios, Patriarch of Constantinople. The Council was attended by 367 bishops.
Almost a century before this, the iconoclastic controversy had once more shaken the foundations of both Church and State in the Byzantine empire. Excessive religious respect and the ascribed miracles to icons by some members of society, approached the point of worship (due only to God) and idolatry. This instigated excesses at the other extreme by which icons were completely taken out of the liturgical life of the Church by the Iconoclasts. The Iconophiles, on the other-hand, believed that icons served to preserve the doctrinal teachings of the Church; they considered icons to be man's dynamic way of expressing the divine through art and beauty.
The Council decided on a doctrine by which icons should be venerated but not worshipped. In answering the Empress' invitation to the Council, Pope Hadrian replied with a letter in which he also held the position of extending veneration to icons but not worship, the last befitting only God.
The decree of the Council for restoring icons to churches added an important clause which still stands at the foundation of the rationale for using and venerating icons in the Orthodox Church to this very day: "We define that the holy icons, whether in colour, mosaic, or some other material, should be exhibited in the holy churches of God, on the sacred vessels and liturgical vestments, on the walls, furnishings, and in houses and along the roads, namely the icons of our Lord God and Saviour Jesus Christ, that of our Lady the Theotokos, those of the venerable angels and those of all saintly people. Whenever these representations are contemplated, they will cause those who look at them to commemorate and love their prototype. We define also that they should be kissed and that they are an object of veneration and honour (timitiki proskynisis), but not of real worship (latreia), which is reserved for Him Who is the subject of our faith and is proper for the divine nature. The veneration accorded to an icon is in effect transmitted to the prototype; he who venerates the icon, venerated in it the reality for which it stands" [emphasis added].
An Endemousa (Regional) Synod was called in Constantinople in 843. Under Empress Theodora. The veneration of icons was solemnly proclaimed at the Hagia Sophia Cathedral. The Empress, her son Michael III, Patriarch Methodios, and monks and clergy came in procession and restored the icons in their rightful place. The day was called "Triumph of Orthodoxy." Since that time, this event is commemorated yearly with a special service on the first Sunday of Lent, the "Sunday of Orthodoxy".
Orthodox teaching about icons, as defined at the Seventh Ecumenical Council of 787, is embodied in the texts sung on this Sunday.
From Vespers: “Inspired by your Spirit, Lord, the prophets foretold your birth as a child incarnate of the Virgin. Nothing can contain or hold you; before the morning star you shone forth eternally from the spiritual womb of the Father. Yet you were to become like us and be seen by those on earth. At the prayers of those your prophets in your mercy reckon us fit to see your light, "for we praise your resurrection, holy and beyond speech. Infinite, Lord, as divine, in the last times you willed to become incarnate and so finite; for when you took on flesh you made all its properties your own. So we depict the form of your outward appearance and pay it relative respect, and so are moved to love you; and through it we receive the grace of healing, following the divine traditions of the apostles.”
“The grace of truth has shone out, the things once foreshadowed now are revealed in perfection. See, the Church is decked with the embodied image of Christ, as with beauty not of this world, fulfilling the tent of witness, holding fast the Orthodox faith. For if we cling to the icon of him whom we worship, we shall not go astray. May those who do not so believe be covered with shame. For the image of him who became human is our glory: we venerate it, but do not worship it as God. Kissing it, we who believe cry out: O God, save your people, and bless your heritage.”
“We have moved forward from unbelief to true faith, and have been enlightened by the light of knowledge. Let us then clap our hands like the psalmist, and offer praise and thanksgiving to God. And let us honor and venerate the holy icons of Christ, of his most pure Mother, and of all the saints, depicted on walls, panels and sacred vessels, setting aside the unbelievers' ungodly teaching. For the veneration given to the icon passes over, as Basil says, to its prototype. At the intercession of your spotless Mother, O Christ, and of all the saints, we pray you to grant us your great mercy. We venerate your icon, good Lord, asking forgiveness of our sins, O Christ our God. For you freely willed in the flesh to ascend the cross, to rescue from slavery to the enemy those whom you had formed. So we cry to you with thanksgiving: You have filled all things with joy, our Savior, by coming to save the world.”
The name of this Sunday reflects the great significance which icons possess for the Orthodox Church. They are not optional devotional extras, but an integral part of Orthodox faith and devotion. They are held to be a necessary consequence of Christian faith in the incarnation of the Word of God, the Second Person of the Trinity, in Jesus Christ [emphasis added]. They have a sacramental character, making present to the believer the person or event depicted on them. So the interior of Orthodox churches is often covered with icons painted on walls and domed roofs, and there is always an icon screen, or iconostasis, separating the sanctuary from the nave, often with several rows of icons. No Orthodox home is complete without an icon corner (iconostasion), where the family prays.
Icons are venerated by burning lamps and candles in front of them, by the use of incense and by kissing. But there is a clear doctrinal distinction between the veneration paid to icons and the worship due to God. The former is not only relative, it is in fact paid to the person represented by the icon. This distinction safeguards the veneration of icons from any charge of idolatry.
The theme of the victory of the icons, by its emphasis on the incarnation, points us to the basic Christian truth that the one whose death and resurrection we celebrate at Easter was none other than the Word of God who became human in Jesus Christ.
Before the Triumph of Orthodoxy came to be celebrated on the first Sunday of Lent, there was on this day a commemoration of Moses, Aaron, Samuel and the prophets. Traces of this more ancient observance can still be seen in the choice of the Epistle reading at the Liturgy and in the Alleluia verse appointed before the Gospel: “Moses and Aaron among His priests, and Samuel among them that call upon His Name.”
Orthodox Christian Commemoration of the Sunday of Orthodoxy
The Sunday of Orthodoxy is commemorated with the Divine Liturgy of Saint Basil the Great, which is preceded by the Matins service. A Great Vespers is conducted on Saturday evening. The hymns of the Triodion for this day are added to the usual prayers and hymns of the weekly commemoration of the Resurrection of Christ.
Scripture readings for the Sunday of Orthodoxy are: At the Orthros (Matins): The prescribed weekly Gospel reading. At the Divine Liturgy: Hebrews 11:24-26,32-40; John 1:43-51.
At the conclusion of the Divine Liturgy, a service is conducted in commemoration of the affirmations of the Seventh Ecumenical Council in 787 and the restoration of the use of icons in 843. Orthodox faithful carry icons in a procession, while the clergy offer petitions for the people, civil authorities, and those who have reposed in the faith. Following is a reading of excerpts from the Affirmation of Faith of the Seventh Ecumenical Council and the singing of the Great Prokeimenon.
It is becoming a common practice that the Procession of the Icons is conducted as part of a Pan-Orthodox Vespers service on the evening of the Sunday of Orthodoxy. This is a service when Orthodox Christians of the various jurisdictions in America come together for worship and in a united affirmation of the Truth of the Orthodox Faith.
On the Saturday before this Sunday, the third of three Saturdays of the Souls are held. This is a special commemoration when the Church offers a Divine Liturgy and Memorial Service for the departed faithful. This is considered a universal commemoration of the dead. Through the memorial services, the Church is commending to God all who have departed and who are now awaiting the Last Judgment.
This specific Saturday is a special commemoration of the Great Martyr Theodore of Tyre and the miracle of the kolyva. In 361, Julian the Apostate was doing his utmost to restore pagan customs. Knowing that the Christians were accustomed to sanctify the first week of Lent by fasting and prayer, the wily tyrant told the Prefect of Constantinople to have all of the food set out for sale in the markets sprinkled with the blood of animals sacrificed to the gods, so that no one in the city would escape the contagion of idolatry. However, the Lord did not abandon His chosen people, but sent His servant Theodore to outwit the tyrant. Appearing in a vision to Patriarch Eudoxius (360-364), the holy Martyr informed him of what was happening and told him to instruct the Christians not to buy food from the markets but instead to eat kolyva made from grains of boiled wheat. Thus, thanks to the intervention of the holy Martyr Theodore, the Christian people were preserved from the stain of idolatry. The Church has commemorated this miracle ever since on the first Saturday of Great Lent, in order to remind the faithful that fasting and temperance have the power to cleanse all the stains of sin.
Troparion
We venerate Your most pure image, O Good One,
And ask forgiveness of our transgressions, O Christ God.
Of Your own will You were pleased to ascend the Cross in the flesh
To deliver Your creatures from bondage to the enemy.
Therefore with thanksgiving we cry aloud to You:
You have filled all with joy, O our Savior,
By coming to save the world.
For Further reading:
Sunday of Orthodoxy (Schmemann)
The First Sunday of Lent: The Sunday of Orthodoxy
The Sermon of St Tikhon on the Sunday of the Triumph of Orthodoxy
The Seventh Ecumenical Council (CCEL)
20090131
"The Ancient Church" documentary
The following is a short documentary on the history of the ancient Orthodox Church. For more information on the people, places, and events mentioned in the videos, click on the links below.
5:16 Ecumenical Councils
6:20 Papal Supremacy
6:23 The Filioque
6:28 The Great Schism of 1054 (also here)
00:13 Luther & 95 Theses, Protestant Reformation
2:00 Patriarch Ignatius IV
2:18 St Ignatius
3:11 Churches of Russia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria & Georgia
3:19 Churches of Cyprus, Greece, Poland & Albania
3:25 Churches of Sinai, Czech Republic, Finland, Japan & China
4:36 Metropolitan Philip
5:49 Fr Peter Gillquist
6:03 Fr Gordon Walker
00:31 Mysteries
00:42 Fr. Jon Braun
20090123
Q&A
A: Technically speaking, we ordain married men — neither priests nor deacons may marry once they are ordained (in some traditions, this applies to ordination of SubDeacons as well). The decision to marry or not must be made prior to ordination, and in the event of the death of his wife, an ordained clergyman may not remarry.
Specifically, It was at the First Lateran Council in 1123 that celibacy became mandatory for Roman Catholic priests. A local council in the West in Elvira, Spain in 316 declared that celibacy was mandatory for clergy, and the practice began to spread in the West over the following centuries under the encouragement of various Popes.
Orthodox have always insisted that celibacy had traditionally been optional for clergy since the first century, citing scriptural and other evidence for married priests and bishops (see for example Mark 1:30, Timothy 3:1-5). And the decisions of local councils are not binding on the church as a whole; only the decisions of ecumenical councils, when accepted by the community as a whole, are binding. Note that as is the case in the West, bishops have been celibate in Orthodoxy since the fifth century, a canon law instituted to halt the loss of land holdings to the descendents of married bishops.
Note, too, that all monastics are celibate in the Orthodox Church. Also, celibacy has always been understood as a tradition rather than as unchangeable doctrine in the West, which is why there have been exceptions made to Roman Catholic priestly celibacy, especially in recent years. There are no doctrinal reasons why a married priesthood could not be restored in the West.
Courtesy of Holy Transfiguration Church
20081219
St Nicholas

Saint Nicholas, the Wonderworker, Archbishop of Myra in Lycia is famed as a great saint pleasing unto God. He was born in the city of Patara in the region of Lycia (on the south coast of the Asia Minor peninsula), and was the only son of pious parents Theophanes and Nonna, who had vowed to dedicate him to God.
From his childhood Nicholas thrived on the study of Divine Scripture; by day he would not leave church, and by night he prayed and read books, making himself a worthy dwelling place for the Holy Spirit. Bishop Nicholas of Patara rejoiced at the spiritual success and deep piety of his nephew. He ordained him a reader, and then elevated Nicholas to the priesthood, making him his assistant and entrusting him to instruct the flock. In serving the Lord the youth was fervent of spirit, and in his proficiency with questions of faith he was like an Elder, who aroused the wonder and deep respect of believers. Constantly at work and vivacious, in unceasing prayer, the priest Nicholas displayed great kind-heartedness towards the flock, and towards the afflicted who came to him for help, and he distributed all his inheritance to the poor.
There was a certain formerly rich inhabitant of Patara, whom St Nicholas saved from great sin. The man had three grown daughters, and in desparation he planned to sell their bodies so they would have money for food. The saint, learning of the man's poverty and of his wicked intention, secretly visited him one night and threw a sack of gold through the window. With the money the man arranged an honorable marriage for his daughter. St Nicholas also provided gold for the other daughters, thereby saving the family from falling into spiritual destruction. In bestowing charity, St Nicholas always strove to do this secretly and to conceal his good deeds.
Upon the death of Archbishop John, Nicholas was chosen as Bishop of Myra [pronounced mee-rah] after one of the bishops of the Council said that a new archbishop should be revealed by God, not chosen by men. One of the elder bishops had a vision of a radiant Man, Who told him that the one who came to the church that night and was first to enter should be made archbishop. He would be named Nicholas. The bishop went to the church at night to await Nicholas. The saint, always the first to arrive at church, was stopped by the bishop. "What is your name, child?" he asked. God's chosen one replied, "My name is Nicholas, Master, and I am your servant."
After his consecration as archbishop, St Nicholas remained a great ascetic, appearing to his flock as an image of gentleness, kindness and love for people. This was particularly precious for the Lycian Church during the persecution of Christians under the emperor Diocletian (284-305). Bishop Nicholas, locked up in prison together with other Christians for refusing to worship idols, sustained them and exhorted them to endure the fetters, punishment and torture. The Lord preserved him unharmed.
Upon the accession of St Constantine (May 21) as emperor, St Nicholas was restored to his flock, which joyfully received their guide and intercessor. Despite his great gentleness of spirit and purity of heart, St Nicholas was a zealous and ardent warrior of the Church of Christ. In the year 325 St Nicholas was a participant in the First Ecumenical Council. This Council proclaimed the Nicean Symbol of Faith, and he stood up against the heretic Arius with the likes of Sts Sylvester the Bishop of Rome (January 2), Alexander of Alexandria (May 29), Spyridon of Trimythontos (December 12) and other Fathers of the Council. St Nicholas, fired with zeal for the Lord, assailed the heretic Arius with his words, and also struck him upon the face. For this reason, he was deprived of the emblems of his episcopal rank and placed under guard.
The Fathers of the Council agreed that the audacity of the saint was pleasing to God, and restored the saint to the office of bishop. Having returned to his own diocese, the saint brought it peace and blessings, sowing the word of Truth, uprooting heresy, nourishing his flock with sound doctrine, and also providing food for their bodies.
Having reached old age, St Nicholas peacefully fell asleep in the Lord. His venerable relics were preserved incorrupt in the local cathedral church and flowed with curative myrrh, from which many received healing. In the year 1087, his relics were transferred to the Italian city of Bari, where they rest even now (See May 9). The name of the great saint of God, the hierarch and wonderworker Nicholas, a speedy helper and suppliant for all hastening to him, is famed in every corner of the earth, in many lands and among many peoples. In Russia there are a multitude of cathedrals, monasteries and churches consecrated in his name. There is, perhaps, not a single city without a church dedicated to him.
See also:
St Nicholas Center
Accounts of Saint Nicholas
Saint Nicholas and the Origin of Santa Claus
20081019
Mary, Part 3 - Theotokos

Other Church leaders, including Cyril, the Archbishop of Alexandria, rejected the teaching that Christ's natures were separate, and convened a Church council in Ephesus in 431 to define, once and for all, the proper understanding of this vital aspect of the Incarnation. They determined that while Christ did, in fact, have two natures, they existed together in hypostasis (ὑπόστᾰσις). Therefore, they reasoned, while Mary was certainly the mother of Christ, to call her simply Christotokos leaves too much room for error with regard to our understanding of Christ's Incarnation. Ultimately, the Church condemned Nestorius as a heretic and declared that Mary is, and shall be, properly referred to as Theotokos.
So, why didn't the Church just define Mary as Mήτηρ τοῦ Θεοῦ (Mother of God)? Because one can mother a child without necessarily bearing him. "Theotokos" actually refers to physical childbirth, while "Mother of God" implies nurturing and rearing. Mary certainly did raise and nurture Christ, but one can to that to an adopted child as well. To say Mary bore Christ leaves no room for doubt that Mary, a virgin, did in fact give birth to a child as prophesied, and that that child was, in fact, God.
Theotokos is a title that the Church has used for more than 1500 years, and that is, in fact, entirely consistent with Scripture (see Lk 1.43), and yet I never once heard it while I was a Protestant. Is there something objectionable about this title? The Church is very clear that it is not intended to imply that Mary is greater than, or equal to, God, or that she is the mother of the Christ's deity or of the Holy Trinity. The title Theotokos is not meant to elevate Mary, but to safeguard a proper understanding of the Incarnation. As Matthew Gallatin writes, "when you face the fact that Mary is Jesus' mother, you realize that what you call her must be entirely consistent with who you believe Jesus to be" (Thirsting for God, p.160).
If the Church felt, and has taught for more than fifteen centuries, that calling Mary Theotokos was necessary in order to affirm the doctrine of the Incarnation, what reason could I have to ignore or reject it? And could I do so and truly hope to affirm the Incarnation myself?
The Mother of God
20080914
The Scriptures, Part 3

Strictly speaking, there never was a Bible in the Orthodox Church, at least not as we commonly think of the Bible as a single volume book we can hold in our hand. Since the beginning of the Church, from the start of our liturgical tradition, there has never been a single book in an Orthodox church we could point to as the Bible. Instead, the various Books of the Bible are found scattered throughout several service books located either on the Holy Altar itself, or at the chanter’s stand. The Gospels (or their pericopes) are complied into a single volume — usually bound in precious metal and richly decorated — placed on the Holy Altar.
The Epistles (or, again, their pericopes) are bound together in another book, called the Apostolos, which is normally found at the chanter’s stand. Usually located next to the Apostolos on the chanter’s shelf are the twelve volumes of the Menaion, as well as the books called the Triodion and Pentekostarion, containing various segments of the Old and the New Testaments.
The fact that there is no Bible in the church should not surprise us, since our liturgical tradition is a continuation of the practices of the early Church, when the Gospels and the letters from the Apostles (the Epistles) had been freshly written and copied for distribution to the Christian communities. The Hebrew Scriptures, what we now call the Old Testament, comprising the Law (the first five books) and the Prophets, were likewise written on various scrolls, just as they were found in the Jewish synagogues.
The Church is not based on the Bible. Rather, the Bible is a product of the Church. For the first few centuries of the Christian era, no one could have put his hands on a single volume called The Bible. In fact, there was no agreement regarding which books of Scripture were to be considered accurate and correct, or canonical. Looking back over history, there were various lists of the canonical books comprising the Bible:
The Muratorian Canon (130 AD) cites all the books we considered as parts of the Bible today, except for Hebrews, Jude, 2 Peter, 2 John, 3 John, and Revelation/Apocalypse; Canon 60 of the local Council of Laodicea (364 AD) cited Revelation/Apocalypse; A festal Epistle by Saint Athanasius (369 AD) lists all of them.
Even so, there was no official, authoritative canon listing all the books until the Sixth Ecumenical Council, at Constantinople in AD 680. Canon II of that Council ratifies the First through the Fifth Ecumenical Councils, as well as the local councils at Carthage (AD 255), Ancyra (AD 315), Neocaesaria (AD 315), Gangra (AD 340), Antioch (AD 341), Laodicea (AD 364), Sardica (AD 347), Constantinople (AD 394), and Carthage (AD 419). When the Council at Laodicea specified the content of the Bible as we know it — 39 years after the First Ecumenical Council (AD 325) and 17 years before the second Ecumenical Council (AD 381) — the Liturgy was pretty much well-defined and established and had been canonized by common usage — the reading from these books. It was not until the invention of the printing press in Western Europe, coinciding with the period of the Protestant Reformation of Western Christianity that the Bible was widely disseminated as a single volume.
20080907
Icons

Icons, in case you're wondering, do not violate the Second Commandment. If it were God’s intention to forbid all images (the word “icon” comes from the Greek word εἰκών, which means "image"), He, in all likelihood, would not have commanded their use in the Tabernacle and in the Temple (cherubim, almond flowers, pomegranates, gourds, palm trees, lilies, lions, bulls, etc.), or even the display of the bronze serpent in the Book of Numbers (21.4-9). God’s commandment was clearly not intended to forbid the creation of images, but rather their worship.
The Church has always practiced the display and veneration of icons, although there have been periods during her history when icons were strongly opposed by certain factions. Finally, near the end of the eighth century, the Church convened a council that affirmed once and for all the display and veneration of sacred images.
>
Right up through the Reformation, most Christian bodies retained the use of images (including statues). Even to this day all but the most iconoclastic of Protestant churches display images of

Icons in the Orthodox Church are more than just decoration (although they certainly are beautiful to look at), they are a theological statement about the Incarnation of Christ, Who is the “image of God” (εἰκών του Θεου) (2 Cor 4.4). According to Metropolitan Kallistos Ware, the Orthodox Church recognizes that “God took a material body, thereby providing that matter can be redeemed: ‘The Word made flesh has deified the flesh,’ said John of Damascus. God had ‘deified’ matter, making it ‘spirit-bearing’; and if flesh has become a vehicle of the Spirit, then so—though in a different way—can wood and paint” (The Orthodox Church, p.33). In other words, it's okay to use material items in our worship of God.
Instruction
I have heard icons referred to as “theology in color.” What the Bible is to paper and ink, the icon is to wood (or plaster) and paint. What the Scriptures teach us through the printed page, the icons teach us with colors and shapes. Icons often depict events from the Bible or from Church history and therefore serve as tools of instruction in much the same way that stained-glass windows have historically in the Western Church. However, icons tend to be much heavier on symbolism. Every color, every posture, even the position of the hands, has a specific theological significance.

Icons are not portraits and are not intended to be realistic in the way that other paintings usually are, but are intended to communicate a spiritual reality. One of the techniques often used to achieve this is called “inverse perspective,” which you can read about here or here or here. Iconographers are pious, disciplined people who pray and fast prior to and during the creation of an icon; with each stroke of the brush a prayer is offered to God. Iconographers aren't free to alter the style of icons as they see fit, but use a style and a technique and a fomat that has been preserved unchanged in the Church for nearly a hundred generations. They are very careful to write (iconographers are said to "write," rather than "paint" icons) these images in precisely the same way they have been written since the Church began. I envision ancient monastic scholars praying over every penstroke as they transcribe the Scriptures, taking great pains not to alter a comma, lest they distort the meaning of the text. The same is true for inconographers and the way they pass on spiritual Truth through color.
Sacred Space
When you walk into an Orthodox temple, you know you're in a sacred place; a place that has been set aside solely for the purpose of worship. An Orthodox house of worship will never be mistaken for a theater or a high school auditorium, or any other secular venue. When you’re standing among images of saints and angels, you know where you are and for what purpose!
Worship in Heaven
Christian worship is intended to imitate heavenly worship (Heb 8.5). The interior of an Orthodox temple reflects that worship. One reason for the icons is to show us the “great could of witnesses” that worship with us. When the Jews worshipped in the Tabernacle and later in the Temple, they were surrounded by images of Heaven. Those images didn’t include Saints until Christ released the saints from Sheol and escorted them to Paradise. Now, in continuity with that ancient worship, the Orthodox Church shows us Heaven with the saints and martyrs, ascetics, virgins, unmercenaries, wonderworkers, and Apostles all around, worshipping the Trinity alongside us.

In Christ’s halo is a cross, on the arms of which are the words “Ο ΩΝ,” which means “He Who Is,” or “I Am” (Exodus 3:14, Revelation 4:8).

Veneration
One thing that is very troubling to Protestant sensibilities is the Orthodox practice of venerating icons.
When one enters an Orthodox house of worship, one is likely to see parishioners bowing their heads, lighting candles, and making the sign of the Cross before the icons, and even kissing them. These actions are horrifying to a Protestant, and especially to one, such as myself, raised in the Baptist faith.
But, why is this practice so distressing? Are the Orthodox worshipping these icons? The Orthodox will say certainly not; that there is a big difference between worship or adoration—which are for the Holy Trinity alone—and the veneration, reverence, honor, and respect, which are paid to sacred items and holy people: worship is a total giving over of the self to be united with God, while veneration is showing delight for what God has done.
For millennia the Jews have understood the difference between veneration and worship: they kiss the mezuzah on their door post, they kiss the tallit before putting it on, they kiss the Torah before reading it in the Synagogue. Certainly Christ Himself did likewise when reading the Scriptures in the Synagogue. I doubt anyone confused these actions with idol worship.
And I think it’s a safe bet that I can get away with kissing a picture of my wife, or my grandfather’s headstone, or even a letter that he wrote without anyone accusing me of worshipping those items or the family members they call to mind. (I don’t know of a single Christian who will deny that humans are created in the image of God. In Genesis 1.26 God is quoted as saying “Let Us make man in Our image” (LXX: εικονα). So, when we kiss our loved ones, we are literally venerating icons of God!)
As a member of the Selfridge Honor Guard, I attended hundreds of funerals where a grieving next-of-kin would kiss the folded Flag and never once did it occur to me that that person might be worshipping the flag or the person in whose memory the flag was presented.*
The truth is, if I’m not scandalized by this…
…what reason could I possibly have to be distressed by a Christian kissing an image of Christ?Anyone who has been to the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C. is sure to have seen people kneeling, laying flowers, lighting candles, kissing the wall, or bowing their heads in prayer. There is nothing improper or sacrilegious about this. It’s a very human and heartfelt expression of honor and respect, and no one will deny that those who made the ultimate sacrifice in service to our Country are deserving of our respect, our gratitude, our honor.
How much more, then, is our honor and respect due to those who lived and died, who surrendered everything, who denied themselves and daily bore their crosses in service to the Lord?
For more information:
The Function of Icons
No Graven Image: Icons and Their Proper Use
What Do Icons Mean?
Is Venerating Icons Idolatry?
The Icon FAQ
Talk given by Fr. Jacob Myers at St John’s Church in Atlanta
*If we truly believe that the Second Commandment strictly forbids the display of “anything in heaven above,” then the U.S. flag itself is a violation of this commandment fifty times over! In which case we violate God’s commandment fifty times whenever we salute, rise to our feet in the presence of, or pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States.
20080725
Church History
Therefore, in order to spare my readers the shame of not knowing their Crusades from their Reformation, I have compiled this brief summary of the otherwise very long, dramatic, complicated, and brutally violent history of the Christian Church:

In the aftermath of a devastating fire in Rome in A.D. 64, persecution of Christians became the state policy of the Empire, and remained so for the next 249 years, during which time thousands of Christians were put to death, including all but one of the Twelve Apostles, every single bishop of Rome, and such Christian luminaries as Ignatius of Antioch, Justin of Caesarea, Perpetua and Felicity, Polycarp, and Irenaeus.
When the Romans destroyed the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70, Antioch became the center of Christianity. Twenty-five years later, St John the Evangelist completed his book of Revelation, the last canonical book of the New Testament.
In 301, Armenia became the first nation ever to adopt Christianity as the state religion. Ten years later, the Emperor Galerius, formerly an adversary of Christianity, issued a deathbed statute suspending the state policy of persecution against Christians. Then, in 313, the Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity and issued the Edict of Milan, legalizing Christianity in the Empire; he then relocated his capital to Byzantium, renaming it Constantinople. In 391, the emperor Theodosius made Christianity the official religion of the empire. As Christianity spread, many false teachings, or heresies, sprang up. In response to these heresies, the Church held a number of Ecumenical Councils, affirming the "faith which

A series of local councils during the 4th and 5th centuries ratified and confirmed the canon of Scripture, rejecting many books and epistles thought to be uninspired or of questionable doctrinal integrity.
In 589, a local synod of bishops in Toledo, Spain, in an attempt to fight Arianism, inserted the filioque clause (Latin: filius “son” and -que “and the”) into the Nicene Creed. This addition, although initially rejected by the Eastern and Western churches alike, was gradually adopted by Rome and is generally regarded as the first in a long succession of events that eventually led to the rupture between the Eastern and Western Churches.
An Arabian merchant and self-proclaimed prophet named Muhammad began in 632 to preach a new faith (الإسلام al-'islām, meaning “submission”), which spread rapidly throughout the Middle East and North Africa, beginning what would up to the

Pope Leo III, in 800, further set the east and west at odds when, despite the fact that the Roman Empire was still alive and well in Constantinople, he crowned the Frankish king Charlemagne Holy Roman Emperor in the west.
In 862, two brothers from Thessalonika, Greece, named Cyril and Methodius, set out to evangelize the Slavs. Their evangelization


The Roman church, after centuries of debate and equivocation, formally confirmed the use of the filioque in 1009 by inserting it into the Mass, and Constantinople in response, removed the name of the Roman pope from their diptychs (the prayers venerating and recognizing Orthodox bishops). For the next forty-five years, the popes of Rome attempted to be reinstalled in the diptychs, which the Patriarch of Constantinople refused unless Rome dropped the filioque. Then in 1054, a delegation from Pope Leo IX walked into the Church of the Holy Wisdom (Άγία Σοφία) in Constantinople during the Liturgy and laid a bull of excommunication from the pope upon the altar, making official the break in communion between the churches of Rome and Constantinople.
In 1066, William the Conqueror of Normandy invaded England and defeated the Orthodox king Harold II at the Battle of Hastings. Pope Alexander II of Rome crowned William of Normandy king of England and Orthodox English bishops where then systematically deposed, imprisoned, or executed (or all three!), and replaced with Norman bishops loyal to Rome.
In early 1095, the Byzantine Emperor Alexius I sent to Rome for help defending his empire against the invading Islamic Seljuk Turks. Later that year, Pope Urban II, at the Council of Clermont,

The Emperor Michael VIII Palaeologus recaptured Constantinople from Latin rule in 1261.
At the Council of Florence in 1439, an attempt was made at reconciliation and reunification between the Eastern and Western churches. A few eastern churches submitted to Rome, but the majority felt that the filioque and papal supremacy represented an impasse to East/West reunion.

Two years later, the German inventor Johann Gutenberg printed the Bible for the first time ever.
Then in 1478 Pope Sixtus IV granted Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile permission to launch the Spanish Inquisition, a church tribunal targeting recent Jewish converts to Christianity, and later Protestants. The tribunal was officially abolished in 1834 by Isabella II.

During the 16th century, various Christian groups began parting ways with the Roman church because of disagreements regarding theology, practice, hierarchy, etc. In 1517 Martin Luther touched off the Protestant Reformation with the publication of his 95 Theses, and in 1534 King Henry VIII rejected papal authority and named himself supreme head of the Church of England. Soon dozens—and later hundreds—of groups also split with Rome, and then with each other.
Tsar Peter the Great of Russia began reforms of the Russian Orthodox Church in 1700, altering the church government and restricting entry into monasteries. These reforms essentially made the Church a department of state, severely weakening it and placing it in a poor position to take on the challenges it would face centuries later.
In September 1794, eight Russian monks, including St Juvenal, the first Orthodox martyr of the New World, arrived in Alaska, introducing Orthodox Christianity to the indigenous peoples of America and initiating an evangelization mission that would reach as far south as California.
During the nineteenth century, the Roman Catholic Church introduced new doctrines to the faith, including the Immaculate Conception in 1854 and papal infallibility in 1870.
In 1917, the largest Christian nation in the world fell into Communist control. From that time until the fall of Communism in 1990, the Russian Church suffered persecution on a scale never before realized as nearly fifty million Russian Christians were martyred for their faith.

On 25 July 2008, Ukraine celebrated the 1020th anniversary of St Vladimir's baptism and the conversion of Kievan Rus'.
Today, there are approximately 2 billion self-professed Christians in the world who belong to over thirty-thousand confessional bodies.
Here is a graphical timeline of Church history.
For a fascinating account of the early Church through the middle of the fourth century, read Eusebius' Church History
*While each side believed—and still believes—that they alone were catholic (i.e. “universal and complete”) and orthodox (i.e. “theologically correct”), over the centuries the western Church came to be known as the “Catholic” or “Roman Catholic” church, while the eastern Church came to be known as the “Orthodox” or “Eastern Orthodox” church.
20080711
The Councils
But if anyone had asked me to point to the Bible verse or verses that spell out this precise understanding of God, I would have been at a loss. In fact, there is no place in the Bible that actually does specifically define the Trinity in this way. Nor for that matter is there to my knowledge anywhere in the Bible that explicitly lays out the belief that Christ is fully human and fully divine.
Rather these doctrines, and many others, were defined by the Church through a series of seven churchwide, or “ecumenical,” (from οἰκουμένη, meaning "the inhabited world") councils during the first eight centuries. The purpose of the councils was to condemn heresy, not to provide an exhaustive explanation of Christian Doctrine. As Clark Carlson writes in his book The Truth,
All early conciliar definitions of dogma were the response to specific heresies. The Church defined the doctrine of the Trinity in response to Arianism and Eunomianism, and even then the Church never pretended to define the "whole truth" about the mystery of the Trinity. Similarly, the Christological definitions of the later councils were occasioned by the heresies of Nestorianism, Monophysitism, Monothelitism, and Iconoclasm. Nowhere did the Fathers of these councils claim to have exhausted the "whole truth" about the mystery of the Incarnation. These definitions never ever presumed to explain these mysteries, but to exclude false opinions. They were not so much positive statements as negative ones (p.163)

Held in A.D. 325 in Nicaea, Asia Minor; Convened by the Emperor Constantine the Great; Attended by 318 bishops.
Condemned Arianism and attempted to standardize Easter.
Adopted the original Nicene Creed, devising the term homoousios (from the Greek όμού meaning “same” and ουσία meaning “essence or being”) to describe Christ’s relationship to the Father (contrary to homoiousios: from όμοιος meaning “similar” and ουσία meaning “essence or being.”)
This and all subsequent councils are not recognized by nontrinitarian churches: Arians, Unitarians, Latter-day Saints and members of other Mormon denominations, and Jehovah's Witnesses.
Key figures:
Alexander of Constantinople, bishop
Eusebius of Caesarea, historian
Athanasius of Alexandria, theologian
Arius of Alexandria, priest
2. First Council of Constantinople:
Held in A.D. 381 in Constantinople, Asia Minor; Convened by the Emperor Theodosius the Great; Attended by 150 bishops.
Condemned Macedonianism and Apollinarianism; Defined the doctrine of the Holy Spirit; decreed that there was one God in three persons.
Revised the Nicene Creed into the present form used in the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches and prohibited any further alteration of the Creed without the assent of an Ecumenical Council.
Key figures:
Basil of Caesarea, bishop and theologian
Gregory of Nyssa, bishop and theologian
Gregory of Nazianzus, bishop and theologian
Macedonius I of Constantinople, bishop
Apollinaris of Laodicea, bishop
3. First Council of Ephesus:
Held in A.D. 431 in Ephesus, Asia Minor; Convened by the Emperor Theodosius II (grandson of Theodosius the Great); Attended by 200 bishops.
Condemned Nestorianism; proclaimed that Jesus was fully divine from conception, thus naming the Virgin Mary the Theotokos (Greek Θεοτόκος, "God-bearer" or more commonly "Mother of God"); Declared that Jesus Christ is one person, not two separate "people": the Man, Jesus Christ and the Son of God, complete God and complete man, with a rational soul and body.
Affirmed the text of the "Creed" decreed at the First and Second Ecumenical Councils to be complete and forbade any addition or deletion.
This and all following councils are not recognized by the Assyrian Church of the East.
Key figures:
Cyril of Alexandria, bishop
John Chrysostom, bishop
Nestorius of Constantinople, bishop
4. Council of Chalcedon:
Held in A.D. 451 in Chalcedon near Constantinople; Convened by the Emperor Marcian; Attended by 630 bishops.
Condemned the doctrine of monophysitism; described and delineated the "Hypostatic Union" and affirmed the two natures of Christ: human and divine.
Adopted the Chalcedonian Creed.
Recognized Constantinople as the “New Rome” and granted Jerusalem the fifth position of honor within the “Pentarchy”: 1) Rome, 2) Constantinope, 3) Alexandria, 4) Antioch, 5) Jerusalem.
This and all following councils are not recognized by the Oriental Orthodox.
Key figure:
Leo I of Rome, bishop
5. Second Council of Constantinople:
Held in A.D. 553 in Constantinople; Convened by the Emperor Justinian the Great; Attended by 165 bishops.
Reaffirmed decisions and doctrines explicated by previous Councils, condemned new Arian, Nestorian, and Monophysite writings, decreed Theopaschite Formula (“God suffered in the flesh”).
Key figures:
Eutychius of Constantinople, bishop
Vigilius of Rome, bishop6. Third Council of Constantinople:
Held in A.D. 680 in Constantinople; Convened by the Emperor Constantine IV; Attended by 170 bishops.
Condemned monothelitism, affirmed that Christ had both human and divine wills, that He acted as God only: that His divine will made the decisions but His human will carried them out.
Key figure:
Maximus the Confessor, theologian
7. Second Council of Nicaea:
Held in A.D. 787 in Nicaea; Convened by the Empress Irene; Attended by 367 bishops.
Condemned iconoclasm, upheld the display and veneration of icons.
Addressed the broader issues of the character of Christ's human nature, the Christian attitude toward matter, and the true meaning of Christian redemption and the salvation of the entire material universe.
Key figures:
Tarasios of Constantinople, bishop
John of Damascus, theologian and hymnographer
For a more thorough treatment of these councils, I highly recommend this excellent series of lectures.
The Heresies
The Apostle Paul warned us that the Church would be attacked by false teachings, or heresies:
"For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths." (2 Tim 4.3-4)
Heresy (from the Greek word αιρεσις, which is a derivative of αιρεομαι, meaning "to choose") always comes from within the Church, never from without. It is not simply a difference of opinion, but is a corruption or perversion of correct (i.e. orthodox) teaching. Islam, for example, which rejects the doctrine of the Trinity, is not a heresy; it’s an entirely different religion. However, a Christian doctrine that rejects the Trinity is a heresy.
Heresy is not the same as apostasy, which is a rejection of the Christian faith entirely.
The following are a few of the major heresies that the Church has confronted over the centuries:
The Judaizers (1st Century)
Taught that one must become a Jew in order to be a Christian (Acts 15.1). The majority of the first Christians were Jews, and early Christianity itself was considered to be a part of Judaism. As Gentiles (non-Jews) sought conversion, a conflict arose concerning what was required of them in order to become Christians.
The Church declared that Gentiles may become Christians without being required to keep the Law of Moses. Paul vigorously defended this teaching in his epistles to the churches in areas where the Judaizers’ heresy had spread, such as Rome (3.27-31), Philipi (3.2-4), and Galatia (2.11-21).
Condemned by the Council of Jerusalem, A.D. 50
Gnosticism (1st and 2nd Centuries)
From the Greek γνώσις meaning “knowledge.” Taught that matter is evil and that salvation is achieved through a cosmic process in which one gains ever deeper spiritual insights.
Gnosticism rejected the Incarnation and contradicted the scriptural teaching that everything God created is “very good” (Gen 1.31).
They also believed in divine beings, known as “æons,” who mediated between man and the ultimate, unreachable God, and that the lowest of these æons, the one with whom men had contact, was Jesus Christ.
Docetism, from the Greek δοκέω meaning “to seem,” was a subcategory of Gnosticism that believed Christ was a purely spiritual being and only seemed to have a physical body and to physically die.
Condemned in one form or another by every Church council
Sabellianism (Early 3rd Century)
Also called Modalism and Monarchianism, this heresy taught that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were not three distinct persons, but three aspects or “modes” of one person. According to them, the three persons of the Trinity exist only in God’s relation to man, not in objective reality.
Condemned by the First Council of Constantinople, 381
Arianism (4th Century)
Arius, a priest from Alexandria, denied the divinity of Christ and taught that, if Jesus was born, then there must have been a time when He did not exist; if Jesus became divine, then there was a time when He was not divine. By citing Scripture and dressing his heresy in orthodox or near-orthodox terminology, Arius was able to muster the support of many bishops.
Condemned by the First Council of Nicaea, 325
Macedonianism (4th Century)
Named for Bishop Macedonius I of Constantinople, who denied the divinity of the Holy Spirit.
Condemned by the First Council of Constantinople, 381
Apollinarianism (4th Century)
Also called Apollinarism. A belief taught by Apollinaris, bishop of Laodicea, that Jesus had a human body, but a divine soul.
Condemned by the First Council of Constantinople, 381
Donatism (4th Century)
Named for Donatus Magnus, whose followers refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the Roman persecution.
Condemned by the Synod of Arles, 314; and the Council of Carthage, 411
Pelagianism (5th Century)
Pelagius, a British theologian, taught that we can become personally righteous by imitating Christ without the need of God’s grace. He believed that man is born morally neutral and can achieve salvation through his own efforts, and that the purpose of God’s grace is merely to make easier the otherwise difficult task of pursuing righteousness.
Condemned by the Council of Ephesus, 431
Nestorianism (5th Century)
Named for Archbishop Nestorius of Constantinople, who taught that the Virgin Mary gave birth to a man, Jesus Christ, not God. Nestorius claimed that she bore only Christ’s human nature in her womb, and proposed the title Christotokos (Greek Χριστοτόκος "Christ-bearer" or "Mother of Christ"). He taught that Christ was a vessel for divinity but not Himself divine.
Condemned by the Council of Ephesus, 431
Monophysitism (5th Century)
Originating as a reaction to Nestorianism, monophysitism (from μόνος “one” and φυσις “nature”) went to the other extreme, claiming that Christ was one person with only one nature: a fusion of human and divine elements.
Condemned by the Council of Chalcedon, 451
Monothelitism (7th Century)
A misguided attempt to appease the non-Chalcedonian churches, monothelitism (from μόνoς “one” and θέληση “will”) taught that Jesus Christ had two natures but only one will.
Condemned by the Third Council of Constantinople, 680
Iconoclasm (7th and 8th Centuries)
This heresy, driven by a misinterpretation of the Second Commandment and propogated by a group of people known as iconoclasts (literally "icon smashers"), taught that it was sinful to make pictures and statues of Christ and the saints.
Condemned by the Second Council of Nicaea, 787