ATTENTION: Visitors looking for the Royal Eagle restaurant website, click here
Showing posts with label Creeds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creeds. Show all posts

20101206

St Nicholas: He Who Punches Heretics in the Face (and Gives Gifts to Children)

[nicholas-punches-arius.jpg]
source
When President Teddy Roosevelt was a college student, he taught a Sunday School class for elementary school children. During this time, Roosevelt awarded a dollar to a boy in his Sunday School class for beating the snot out of a bully who tormented little girls. "You did exactly right," said Roosevelt with pride. However, the congregation disagreed. They immediately dismissed Roosevelt for teaching the "un-Christian" principle of laying the smack down on those who have it coming to them.
Well, if tradition is true, that little boy was also richly rewarded by Jolly Old Saint Nicholas since the good Saint Nick allegedly "h-slapped" ("heretic slapped") the heresiarch Arius. You see, Arius wrongly taught that Christ was not fully divine. Rather, Arius taught that Christ had been created by God the Father.
During the First Ecumenical Council of Nicea (AD 325), Arius was called upon to defend his position on the inferiority of Christ. Saint Nicholas just couldn't listen to all of Arius' nonsense and so he stood up and laid in to Arius with his fist.
The Emperor Constantine and the bishops present at the Council were alarmed by Nicholas' act of violence against Arius. They immediately stripped Nicholas of his office as a bishop by confiscating the two items that marked out a man as a Christian bishop: Nicholas' personal copy of the Gospels and his pallium (the vestment worn by all bishops in the East).
Now if that were the end of the story, we probably wouldn't know about Saint Nicholas, and our children wouldn't be asking him for presents. However, after Nicholas was deposed, the Lord Jesus Christ and the Blessed Virgin Mary visited Nicholas who was being held in a prison cell for his fist-fight with the heretic.
Our Lord Jesus Christ asked Saint Nicholas, "Why are you here?" Nicholas responded, "Because I love you, my Lord and my God."

Christ then presented Nicholas with his copy of the Gospels. Next, the Blessed Virgin vested Nicholas with his episcopal pallium, thus restoring him to his rank as a bishop.

20090131

"The Ancient Church" documentary

The following is a short documentary on the history of the ancient Orthodox Church. For more information on the people, places, and events mentioned in the videos, click on the links below.


5:16 Ecumenical Councils
6:20 Papal Supremacy
6:23 The Filioque
6:28 The Great Schism of 1054 (also here)


00:13 Luther & 95 Theses, Protestant Reformation
2:00 Patriarch Ignatius IV
2:18 St Ignatius
3:11 Churches of Russia, Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria & Georgia
3:19 Churches of Cyprus, Greece, Poland & Albania
3:25 Churches of Sinai, Czech Republic, Finland, Japan & China
4:36 Metropolitan Philip
5:49 Fr Peter Gillquist
6:03 Fr Gordon Walker


00:31 Mysteries
00:42 Fr. Jon Braun

20081207

The Filioque

The filioque (pronounced: filly-oh-quay) is one of those things that you've probably never heard of, but that was--and in many ways still is--a major issue in Christianity. I certainly had no idea what it was until about a year ago, and having learned a bit about it, I don't think it's an exaggeration to say that it is probably one of the top five most controversial subjects in all of Christian history.

The word "filioque" is Latin for "and the son." (filius means "son" and -que is a suffix meaning "and" that is attached to the end of the second of the two words it conjoins. It is considered a word of its own, which is why, for example, the motto of the Roman Republic, Senatus Populusque Romanus, is abbreviated "SPQR.") It was first inserted into the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed by sixth-century Spanish bishops, and eventually came to be accepted by the entire western Church, to the extreme consternation of the East. It amended the third article of the Creed to read "and in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the Giver of life, Who proceedes from the Father and the Son..."

I first became aware of the filioque during my investigation of Roman Catholicism, and determined quickly that, as with any aspect of Trinitarian theology, its legitimacy is way beyond my ability to discern from a theological perspective, and is best left to the experts. However, I was able to look at Scripture and at history to get a sense of whether the filioque is an acceptable addition to the Creed, as the Roman Catholics and most Protestants believe, or a blunder and a travesty, as the Orthodox believe.

First a bit of background information: The first and second Ecumenical Councils composed a statement of faith outlining the very most basic and essential elements of the Christian Faith. It came to be called the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, or Nicene Creed for short, and has been used as the baptismal confession ever since.

In 589, a local church council in Toledo, Spain, which was trying to suppress the Arian heresy, inserted the phrase "filioque" into the Creed in an attempt to bolster the doctrine of Christ's equality with the Father. The use of the filioque spread throughout Europe, but met sharp resistance in Rome, where Pope Leo III had the original text of the Creed engraved in Latin and Greek onto two silver tablets, which he displayed next to the tomb of St Peter along with the inscription:
HAEC LEO POSUI AMORE ET CAUTELA ORTHODOXAE FIDE (I, Leo, place here for the love and protection of the orthodox Faith)
For centuries, European churches continued to use the filioque even though Rome did not. Then, in 1014, at the coronation of Henry II as Holy Roman Emperor, Pope Benedict VIII included the filioque for the first time in a Roman Mass. This action scandalized the Eastern Churches, who removed the name of the Roman Pope from their roster of Orthodox Bishops. The West excommunicated the East. The East excommunicated the West, and the rest is history.

Now, according to Scripture, Christ promised to send the Holy Spirit, Who "proceeds from the Father" (Jn 15.26). Nowhere in Scripture is the Holy Spirit said to proceed also from the Son; however, I'm not aware that the Spirit is anywhere said not to proceed also from the Son. When I was attending RCIA last year, I asked one of the Catholic deacons about this and he told me that, because Christ said that He would send the Spirit, the correct understanding would be that the Spirit proceeds from the Father through the Son. Okay, so why not word it that way, I asked. He didn't have an answer.

I'm not too proud to admit that any doctrine involving the Trinity is far too sophisticated for me to discern intellectually. When someone who knows what they're talking about tells me that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, I nod my head and say "Okay." When they tell me that the Spirit proceeds only from the Father, I nod my head and say "Okay." That's about the best I can do when it comes to the theology of single versus double procession.

However, history tells me that the Creed was written and approved by two Ecumenical Councils--that is, it was approved by the whole Church...twice!!! It was then altered to include the filioque by a local council--that is, by a single diocese acting on its own. Whether their intentions were upright (and it appears that they were), there's no question that they overstepped their authority and unilaterally articulated an understanding of God that differed from that of the Church as a whole; and that was immediately rejected by the Church as a whole (including the popes of Rome themselves), only much later to gain acceptance gradually in the west.

I have read Orthodox theologians who say that the doctrine of double procession (the Spirit proceeds from two sources rather than from one) distorted the western church's understanding of the roles of the three Persons of the Trinity and led it eventually down the path to the doctrines of papal infallibility and universal jurisdiction, and then finally to the many-headed beast that is Protestant Christianity (not my words).

They make a strong case. But then so do the Roman Catholic theologians who oppose "the error that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father, not from the Son."

What is one to believe??

In the end, I have to cast my lot with the Church that has proven itself right with so many other doctrines, and that has clearly shown to have maintained the Faith of the Apostles more consistently than any other.

For more information:
The Filioque
The Filioque (Pelikan)
On the Question of the Filioque
One Single Source

20080807

The Scriptures, Part 1

“We believe the Bible is…the supreme authority and guide for all doctrine and conduct.”
North American Baptist Conference Statement of Beliefs

“[T]he Holy Scriptures are the sole source from which all doctrines proclaimed in the Christian Church must be taken...”
Of the Holy Scriptures, LCMS.org

“[T]he Lutheran Church…is a church whose teaching is based on the words written by the prophets of the Old Testament and the apostles of the New Testament.”
What the Bible and Lutherans Teach, WELS.net

“The Evangelical Covenant Church…confesses that the Holy Scripture, the Old and New Testament, is the Word of God and the only perfect rule for faith, doctrine, and conduct.”
Covenant Affirmations, Page 1

“Moreover, we believe that this Holy Scripture most perfectly contains the whole will of God and that all things are taught in it abundantly…”
Belgic Confession, Article 7

“The Holy Scripture is the only sufficient, certain, and infallible rule of all saving Knowledge, Faith and Obedience.”
1689 Baptist Confession of Faith, Chapter 1, Article 1

“The Supreme Judge, by which all controversies of religion are to be determined, and all decrees of councils, opinions of ancient writers, doctrines of men, and private spirits, are to be examined, and in whose sentence we are to rest, can be no other but the Holy Spirit speaking in the Scripture.”
Westminster Confession, Ch. 1 Article X

“We believe that the Holy Bible…is, and shall remain to the end of the world, the true centre of Christian union, and the supreme standard by which all human conduct, creeds, and opinions should be tried.”
1833 New Hampshire Baptist Confession, Article I

“Holy Scripture conteyneth all thinges necessarie to saluation: so that whatsoeuer is not read therein, nor may be proued therby, is not to be required of anye man, that it shoulde be beleued as an article of the fayth, or be thought requisite [as] necessarie to saluation.”
The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion of the Church of England, 1571, Article VI

I think you get the point.
I could cite hundreds of Protestant confessions, creeds, and affirmations and I’m fairly certain that they would all say basically the same thing: We derive our doctrine and practice from the Bible and nothing else.

In fact, those of my readers who know better can correct me, but to my knowledge, there is not a single one of the more than 30,000 Protestant denominations in this world—who, as we have seen, disagree on nearly every major point of Christian doctrine and practice—that would not claim to derive the entirety of its doctrine and practice from the Bible and nothing else.

Let me say that again: Every one of the tens of thousands of conflicting and contradictory Protestant belief systems in this world is based on someone's interpretation of the Bible.

This is true even for the Roman Catholic Church except that, in addition to the Bible, they also base their doctrine and practice on what they call Sacred Tradition (See Dei Verbum, articles 9 & 10).

There has been much heated debate over the centuries about whether doctrine should be based on Scripture alone (Sola Scriptura) or a combination of Scripture and Tradition.

As with most things, however, the Orthodox Church has a completely different take on the matter.

Clark Carlson explains in his book The Truth that

Orthodoxy is in no way based on the Bible. Nor is it based on or derived from a set of oral teachings that run parallel to the Bible. The Orthodox Church is the living Body of Christ—the living experience in history of the union of mankind with God in the divine-human Person of the Only-Begotten. The Word of God is not a book, but a Person. The Prophets, both those of the Old Covenant and those of the New, are those who have seen and heard and touched the Word of Life.* The Divine Scriptures and the writings of the Saints are the written witness to this experience, but they are not the source of this experience.
Thus, true and false doctrines are not discerned by whether or not one can logically deduce them from the text of the Bible or the writings of a particular Church Father—one can “deduce” just about anything from the Bible, as Protestantism has demonstrated several thousand times over—but whether or not the purported doctrine constitutes a faithful witness to or sign of the communion between God and man that is experienced in the Church (pp.186-7).

Remember when I wrote that Orthodoxy was “a whole new paradigm of Christian worship, devotion, thought, and expression”? Well, this is just one example of what I meant by that.

*1 Jn 1.1

20080725

Church History

I recently read about a daytime talk-show host—a professed Christian—who informed her audience that the ancient Greeks were the ones tossing Christians to the lions and that the Christians predated the Greeks and Romans. Needless to say, this talk-show host has been the target of ridicule since then. And rightly so: not knowing when Christians came onto the scene or who persecuted them is the Christian equivalent of Americans not being able to name the first U.S. president: it's not something you need to know in order to be an American, but it sure helps you understand what being an American is about; and you look like and idiot if you don't know.

Therefore, in order to spare my readers the shame of not knowing their Crusades from their Reformation, I have compiled this brief summary of the otherwise very long, dramatic, complicated, and brutally violent history of the Christian Church:

After Pentecost, sometime around the year A.D. 33, the Apostles disbursed throughout the Roman Empire, establishing churches, appointing church leaders, and baptizing converts, covering a territory that stretched from India to Spain, Britain to Ethiopia. In time, four churches emerged as centers of Christian leadership: Rome, Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem (Constantinople would later be included in this "Pentarchy" and given a rank second behind Rome).

In the aftermath of a devastating fire in Rome in A.D. 64, persecution of Christians became the state policy of the Empire, and remained so for the next 249 years, during which time thousands of Christians were put to death, including all but one of the Twelve Apostles, every single bishop of Rome, and such Christian luminaries as Ignatius of Antioch, Justin of Caesarea, Perpetua and Felicity, Polycarp, and Irenaeus.

When the Romans destroyed the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70, Antioch became the center of Christianity. Twenty-five years later, St John the Evangelist completed his book of Revelation, the last canonical book of the New Testament.

In 301, Armenia became the first nation ever to adopt Christianity as the state religion. Ten years later, the Emperor Galerius, formerly an adversary of Christianity, issued a deathbed statute suspending the state policy of persecution against Christians. Then, in 313, the Emperor Constantine converted to Christianity and issued the Edict of Milan, legalizing Christianity in the Empire; he then relocated his capital to Byzantium, renaming it Constantinople. In 391, the emperor Theodosius made Christianity the official religion of the empire. As Christianity spread, many false teachings, or heresies, sprang up. In response to these heresies, the Church held a number of Ecumenical Councils, affirming the "faith which was once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3) and defending and confirming doctrines related to the Incarnation of Christ and the nature of the Holy Trinity. One of the better-known results of these Councils is the Nicene Creed, which to this day is affirmed by Christians as the fundamental statement of Christian faith.

A series of local councils during the 4th and 5th centuries ratified and confirmed the canon of Scripture, rejecting many books and epistles thought to be uninspired or of questionable doctrinal integrity.

In 589, a local synod of bishops in Toledo, Spain, in an attempt to fight Arianism, inserted the filioque clause (Latin: filius “son” and -que “and the”) into the Nicene Creed. This addition, although initially rejected by the Eastern and Western churches alike, was gradually adopted by Rome and is generally regarded as the first in a long succession of events that eventually led to the rupture between the Eastern and Western Churches.

An Arabian merchant and self-proclaimed prophet named Muhammad began in 632 to preach a new faith (الإسلام al-'islām, meaning “submission”), which spread rapidly throughout the Middle East and North Africa, beginning what would up to the present day be a major threat to Christianity in the region.

Pope Leo III, in 800, further set the east and west at odds when, despite the fact that the Roman Empire was still alive and well in Constantinople, he crowned the Frankish king Charlemagne Holy Roman Emperor in the west.

In 862, two brothers from Thessalonika, Greece, named Cyril and Methodius, set out to evangelize the Slavs. Their evangelization efforts eventually led to the conversion of Prince Vladimir I of Kiev, who in 988 adopted Christianity as the state religion of Kievan Rus’ (Russia). During his missionary work, St Cyril created a new alphabet into which he translated the Bible. This system of writing, called the Cyrillic alphabet, is still in use today in the languages of Russia, Bulgaria, Ukraine, Macedonia, Serbia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Mongolia.

The Roman church, after centuries of debate and equivocation, formally confirmed the use of the filioque in 1009 by inserting it into the Mass, and Constantinople in response, removed the name of the Roman pope from their diptychs (the prayers venerating and recognizing Orthodox bishops). For the next forty-five years, the popes of Rome attempted to be reinstalled in the diptychs, which the Patriarch of Constantinople refused unless Rome dropped the filioque. Then in 1054, a delegation from Pope Leo IX walked into the Church of the Holy Wisdom (Άγία Σοφία) in Constantinople during the Liturgy and laid a bull of excommunication from the pope upon the altar, making official the break in communion between the churches of Rome and Constantinople.

In 1066, William the Conqueror of Normandy invaded England and defeated the Orthodox king Harold II at the Battle of Hastings. Pope Alexander II of Rome crowned William of Normandy king of England and Orthodox English bishops where then systematically deposed, imprisoned, or executed (or all three!), and replaced with Norman bishops loyal to Rome.

In early 1095, the Byzantine Emperor Alexius I sent to Rome for help defending his empire against the invading Islamic Seljuk Turks. Later that year, Pope Urban II, at the Council of Clermont, called on all Christians to join in a holy war against the Turks and the recovery of the Holy Land from the Muslims, promising immediate remission of sins to those who died in the cause. Thus began the Crusades, which led to the breaking off of communion between Rome and the other Patriarchs—Alexandria, Antioch, and Jerusalem—and the sacking of Constantinople in 1204, further widening the break between East and West. The slaughter of eastern Christians and the desecration of their churches by the participants of the fourth Crusade were regarded by the East as the ultimate outrage, and by this time, neither East nor West recognized the other as belonging to the “One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church.”*

The Emperor Michael VIII Palaeologus recaptured Constantinople from Latin rule in 1261.

At the Council of Florence in 1439, an attempt was made at reconciliation and reunification between the Eastern and Western churches. A few eastern churches submitted to Rome, but the majority felt that the filioque and papal supremacy represented an impasse to East/West reunion.

The Church of Russia became autocephalous in 1448, and Moscow came to be regarded as the Third Rome (after Constantinople), hence the use of the title “tsar” (from “Caesar”) for Russian leaders. Not long after tons of priceless church art treasures were relocated to Moscow from Constantinople, the latter fell to the Islamic Ottoman Empire in 1453. Thus ended the millennium-old Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire.

Two years later, the German inventor Johann Gutenberg printed the Bible for the first time ever.

Then in 1478 Pope Sixtus IV granted Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile permission to launch the Spanish Inquisition, a church tribunal targeting recent Jewish converts to Christianity, and later Protestants. The tribunal was officially abolished in 1834 by Isabella II.

During the 16th century, various Christian groups began parting ways with the Roman church because of disagreements regarding theology, practice, hierarchy, etc. In 1517 Martin Luther touched off the Protestant Reformation with the publication of his 95 Theses, and in 1534 King Henry VIII rejected papal authority and named himself supreme head of the Church of England. Soon dozens—and later hundreds—of groups also split with Rome, and then with each other.

Tsar Peter the Great of Russia began reforms of the Russian Orthodox Church in 1700, altering the church government and restricting entry into monasteries. These reforms essentially made the Church a department of state, severely weakening it and placing it in a poor position to take on the challenges it would face centuries later.

In September 1794, eight Russian monks, including St Juvenal, the first Orthodox martyr of the New World, arrived in Alaska, introducing Orthodox Christianity to the indigenous peoples of America and initiating an evangelization mission that would reach as far south as California.

During the nineteenth century, the Roman Catholic Church introduced new doctrines to the faith, including the Immaculate Conception in 1854 and papal infallibility in 1870.

In 1917, the largest Christian nation in the world fell into Communist control. From that time until the fall of Communism in 1990, the Russian Church suffered persecution on a scale never before realized as nearly fifty million Russian Christians were martyred for their faith.

After the fall of the Iron Curtain, Eastern Europe experienced an explosion of Christian activity that continues to this day.

On 25 July 2008, Ukraine celebrated the 1020th anniversary of St Vladimir's baptism and the conversion of Kievan Rus'.

Today, there are approximately 2 billion self-professed Christians in the world who belong to over thirty-thousand confessional bodies.

Here is a graphical timeline of Church history.

For a fascinating account of the early Church through the middle of the fourth century, read Eusebius' Church History



*While each side believed—and still believes—that they alone were catholic (i.e. “universal and complete”) and orthodox (i.e. “theologically correct”), over the centuries the western Church came to be known as the “Catholic” or “Roman Catholic” church, while the eastern Church came to be known as the “Orthodox” or “Eastern Orthodox” church.

20080711

The Councils

For as long as I can remember, I have believed that the Trinity is three distinct persons in one divine essence, rather than three gods or three personalities or functions of God.
But if anyone had asked me to point to the Bible verse or verses that spell out this precise understanding of God, I would have been at a loss. In fact, there is no place in the Bible that actually does specifically define the Trinity in this way. Nor for that matter is there to my knowledge anywhere in the Bible that explicitly lays out the belief that Christ is fully human and fully divine.
Rather these doctrines, and many others, were defined by the Church through a series of seven churchwide, or “ecumenical,” (from οἰκουμένη, meaning "the inhabited world") councils during the first eight centuries. The purpose of the councils was to condemn heresy, not to provide an exhaustive explanation of Christian Doctrine. As Clark Carlson writes in his book The Truth,

All early conciliar definitions of dogma were the response to specific heresies. The Church defined the doctrine of the Trinity in response to Arianism and Eunomianism, and even then the Church never pretended to define the "whole truth" about the mystery of the Trinity. Similarly, the Christological definitions of the later councils were occasioned by the heresies of Nestorianism, Monophysitism, Monothelitism, and Iconoclasm. Nowhere did the Fathers of these councils claim to have exhausted the "whole truth" about the mystery of the Incarnation. These definitions never ever presumed to explain these mysteries, but to exclude false opinions. They were not so much positive statements as negative ones (p.163)


1. First Council of Nicaea:
Held in A.D. 325 in Nicaea, Asia Minor; Convened by the Emperor Constantine the Great; Attended by 318 bishops.

Condemned Arianism and attempted to standardize Easter.

Adopted the original
Nicene Creed, devising the term homoousios (from the Greek όμού meaning “same” and ουσία meaning “essence or being”) to describe Christ’s relationship to the Father (contrary to homoiousios: from όμοιος meaning “similar” and ουσία meaning “essence or being.”)

This and all subsequent councils are not recognized by nontrinitarian churches: Arians, Unitarians, Latter-day Saints and members of other Mormon denominations, and Jehovah's Witnesses.

Key figures:
Alexander of Constantinople, bishop
Eusebius of Caesarea, historian
Athanasius of Alexandria, theologian
Arius of Alexandria
, priest

2. First Council of Constantinople:
Held in A.D. 381 in Constantinople, Asia Minor; Convened by the Emperor Theodosius the Great; Attended by 150 bishops.

Condemned Macedonianism and Apollinarianism; Defined the doctrine of the Holy Spirit; decreed that there was one God in three persons.

Revised the Nicene Creed into the present form used in the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox churches and prohibited any further alteration of the Creed without the assent of an Ecumenical Council.

Key figures:
Basil of Caesarea, bishop and theologian
Gregory of Nyssa, bishop and theologian
Gregory of Nazianzus, bishop and theologian
Macedonius I of Constantinople, bishop
Apollinaris of Laodicea, bishop

3. First Council of Ephesus:

Held in A.D. 431 in Ephesus, Asia Minor; Convened by the Emperor Theodosius II (grandson of Theodosius the Great); Attended by 200 bishops.

Condemned Nestorianism; proclaimed that Jesus was fully divine from conception, thus naming the Virgin Mary the Theotokos (Greek Θεοτόκος, "God-bearer" or more commonly "Mother of God"); Declared that Jesus Christ is one person, not two separate "people": the Man, Jesus Christ and the Son of God, complete God and complete man, with a
rational soul and body.

Affirmed the text of the "Creed" decreed at the First and Second Ecumenical Councils to be complete and forbade any addition or deletion.

This and all following councils are not recognized by the Assyrian Church of the East.

Key figures:
Cyril of Alexandria, bishop
John Chrysostom, bishop
Nestorius of Constantinople, bishop

4. Council of Chalcedon:
Held in A.D. 451 in Chalcedon near Constantinople; Convened by the Emperor Marcian; Attended by 630 bishops.

Condemned the doctrine of monophysitism; described and delineated the "
Hypostatic Union" and affirmed the two natures of Christ: human and divine.

Adopted the
Chalcedonian Creed.

Recognized Constantinople as the “New Rome” and granted Jerusalem the fifth position of honor within the “
Pentarchy”: 1) Rome, 2) Constantinope, 3) Alexandria, 4) Antioch, 5) Jerusalem.

This and all following councils are not recognized by the
Oriental Orthodox.

Key figure:
Leo I of Rome, bishop

5. Second Council of Constantinople:
Held in A.D. 553 in Constantinople; Convened by the Emperor Justinian the Great; Attended by 165 bishops.

Reaffirmed decisions and doctrines explicated by previous Councils, condemned new Arian, Nestorian, and Monophysite writings, decreed Theopaschite Formula (“God suffered in the flesh”).

Key figures:
Eutychius of Constantinople, bishop
Vigilius of Rome, bishop

6. Third Council of Constantinople:
Held in A.D. 680 in Constantinople; Convened by the Emperor Constantine IV; Attended by 170 bishops.

Condemned monothelitism, affirmed that Christ had both human and divine wills, that He acted as God only: that His divine will made the decisions but His human will carried them out.

Key figure:
Maximus the Confessor, theologian

7. Second Council of Nicaea:
Held in A.D. 787 in Nicaea; Convened by the Empress Irene; Attended by 367 bishops.

Condemned iconoclasm, upheld the display and veneration of icons.

Addressed the broader issues of the character of Christ's human nature, the Christian attitude toward matter, and the true meaning of Christian redemption and the salvation of the entire material universe.

Key figures:
Tarasios of Constantinople, bishop
John of Damascus, theologian and hymnographer

For a more thorough treatment of these councils, I highly recommend this excellent series of lectures.

The Heresies

The Apostle Paul warned us that the Church would be attacked by false teachings, or heresies:

"For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths." (2 Tim 4.3-4)

Heresy (from the Greek word αιρεσις, which is a derivative of αιρεομαι, meaning "to choose") always comes from within the Church, never from without. It is not simply a difference of opinion, but is a corruption or perversion of correct (i.e. orthodox) teaching. Islam, for example, which rejects the doctrine of the Trinity, is not a heresy; it’s an entirely different religion. However, a Christian doctrine that rejects the Trinity is a heresy.

Heresy is not the same as apostasy, which is a rejection of the Christian faith entirely.

The following are a few of the major heresies that the Church has confronted over the centuries:

The Judaizers (1st Century)
Taught that one must become a Jew in order to be a Christian (Acts 15.1). The majority of the first Christians were Jews, and early Christianity itself was considered to be a part of Judaism. As Gentiles (non-Jews) sought conversion, a conflict arose concerning what was required of them in order to become Christians.
The Church declared that Gentiles may become Christians without being required to keep the Law of Moses. Paul vigorously defended this teaching in his epistles to the churches in areas where the Judaizers’ heresy had spread, such as Rome (3.27-31), Philipi (3.2-4), and Galatia (2.11-21).
Condemned by the Council of Jerusalem, A.D. 50

Gnosticism (1st and 2nd Centuries)
From the Greek γνώσις meaning “knowledge.” Taught that matter is evil and that salvation is achieved through a cosmic process in which one gains ever deeper spiritual insights.
Gnosticism rejected the Incarnation and contradicted the scriptural teaching that everything God created is “very good” (Gen 1.31).
They also believed in divine beings, known as “æons,” who mediated between man and the ultimate, unreachable God, and that the lowest of these æons, the one with whom men had contact, was Jesus Christ.
Docetism, from the Greek δοκέω meaning “to seem,” was a subcategory of Gnosticism that believed Christ was a purely spiritual being and only seemed to have a physical body and to physically die.
Condemned in one form or another by every Church council

Sabellianism (Early 3rd Century)
Also called Modalism and Monarchianism, this heresy taught that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were not three distinct persons, but three aspects or “modes” of one person. According to them, the three persons of the Trinity exist only in God’s relation to man, not in objective reality.
Condemned by the First Council of Constantinople, 381

Arianism (4th Century)
Arius, a priest from Alexandria, denied the divinity of Christ and taught that, if Jesus was born, then there must have been a time when He did not exist; if Jesus became divine, then there was a time when He was not divine. By citing Scripture and dressing his heresy in orthodox or near-orthodox terminology, Arius was able to muster the support of many bishops.
Condemned by the First Council of Nicaea, 325

Macedonianism (4th Century)
Named for Bishop Macedonius I of Constantinople, who denied the divinity of the Holy Spirit.
Condemned by the First Council of Constantinople, 381

Apollinarianism (4th Century)
Also called Apollinarism. A belief taught by Apollinaris, bishop of Laodicea, that Jesus had a human body, but a divine soul.
Condemned by the First Council of Constantinople, 381

Donatism (4th Century)
Named for Donatus Magnus, whose followers refused to accept the sacraments and spiritual authority of the priests and bishops who had fallen away from the faith during the Roman persecution.
Condemned by the Synod of Arles, 314; and the Council of Carthage, 411

Pelagianism (5th Century)
Pelagius, a British theologian, taught that we can become personally righteous by imitating Christ without the need of God’s grace. He believed that man is born morally neutral and can achieve salvation through his own efforts, and that the purpose of God’s grace is merely to make easier the otherwise difficult task of pursuing righteousness.
Condemned by the Council of Ephesus, 431

Nestorianism (5th Century)
Named for Archbishop Nestorius of Constantinople, who taught that the Virgin Mary gave birth to a man, Jesus Christ, not God. Nestorius claimed that she bore only Christ’s human nature in her womb, and proposed the title Christotokos (Greek Χριστοτόκος "Christ-bearer" or "Mother of Christ"). He taught that Christ was a vessel for divinity but not Himself divine.
Condemned by the Council of Ephesus, 431

Monophysitism (5th Century)
Originating as a reaction to Nestorianism, monophysitism (from μόνος “one” and φυσις “nature”) went to the other extreme, claiming that Christ was one person with only one nature: a fusion of human and divine elements.
Condemned by the Council of Chalcedon, 451

Monothelitism (7th Century)
A misguided attempt to appease the non-Chalcedonian churches, monothelitism (from μόνoς “one” and θέληση “will”) taught that Jesus Christ had two natures but only one will.
Condemned by the Third Council of Constantinople, 680

Iconoclasm (7th and 8th Centuries)
This heresy, driven by a misinterpretation of the Second Commandment and propogated by a group of people known as iconoclasts (literally "icon smashers"), taught that it was sinful to make pictures and statues of Christ and the saints.
Condemned by the Second Council of Nicaea, 787

The Creeds

Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed:
Recognized today as the Nicene Creed, this creed was formulated to combat various heresies and is recited today as the primary affirmation of the Christian faith.
Its original form was accepted by the First Ecumenical Council (Nicaea, 325):

We believe in one God, the Father almighty, maker of all things, visible and invisible; And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten from the Father, only-begotten, that is, from the essence of the Father, God from God, light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one essence with the Father, through Whom all things came into being, things in heaven and things on earth, Who because of us men and because of our salvation came down and became incarnate, becoming man, suffered and rose again on the third day, ascended to the heavens, and will come again to judge the living and the dead; And in the Holy Spirit.

The Second Ecumenical Council (Constantinople, 381) clarified its statement about the nature of Christ, and added a more complete statement regarding the Holy Spirit:

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible;

And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the Only-begotten, Begotten of the Father before all worlds, Light of Light, Very God of Very God, Begotten, not made; of one essence with the Father, by whom all things were made:Who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven, and was incarnate of the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary, and was made man; And was crucified also for us under Pontius Pilate, and suffered and was buried; And the third day He rose again, according to the Scriptures; And ascended into heaven, and sitteth at the right hand of the Father; And He shall come again with glory to judge the living and the dead, Whose kingdom shall have no end.

And we believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, and Giver of Life, Who proceeds from the Father, Who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, Who spoke by the Prophets;

And we believe in one, holy, catholic, and apostolic Church. We acknowledge one Baptism for the remission of sins. We look for the Resurrection of the dead, And the Life of the world to come. Amen

Chalcedonian Creed:
A profession of faith ascepted by the Fourth Ecumenical Council (Chalcedon, 451) and intended to counter monophysitism.
We, then, following the holy Fathers, all with one consent, teach men to confess one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, the same perfect in Godhead and also perfect in manhood;truly God and truly man, of a reasonable [rational] soul and body;consubstantial [co-essential] with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood;in all things like unto us, without sin; begotten before all ages of the Father according to the Godhead, and in these latter days, for us and for our salvation, born of the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God, according to the Manhood;one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, only begotten, to be acknowledged in two natures, inconfusedly, unchangeably, indivisibly, inseparably;the distinction of natures being by no means taken away by the union, but rather the property of each nature being preserved, and concurring in one Person and one Subsistence, not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son, and only begotten, God the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ;as the prophets from the beginning [have declared] concerning Him, and the Lord Jesus Christ Himself has taught us, and the Creed of the holy Fathers has handed down to us.