Karloutsos and 9/11
-
This article is the fourth in a series on Fr Alex Karloutsos, based on many
hours’ worth of interviews I did with him in 2024. Here are the previous
thre...
2 days ago
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
So, I'm confused. Where's the Apostolic succession, if a Patriarch is 'voted' in? Is that only with bishops?
He was already a bishop, only in another diocese. Basically, all they did is take him out of one diocese and put him in another, and give him a new title.
When he was consecrated a bishop, it was done by two other bishops, who each were consecrated by two bishops, and so on, all the way back to the Apostles.
No one can be a bishop (or a priest) in the Orthodox Church without having two or more bishops lay hands on them, who in turn can trace the laying on of hands back to the Apostles.
Okay, I get it.
Still, Patriarhs, Bishops, Metropolitans, Archimandites, Primates (I thought those were monkeys), priests ... so many strange titles. Confusing, really.
It is confusing, I agree.
But keep in mind that there are only four orders of church government: laity, deacon, priest, and bishop. All the other many titles (and there are a lot more than the ones you listed) simply indicate one's administrative function or varying degrees of responsibility. For example, bishops, archbishops, metropolitans, and patriarchs are all bishops. And technically no bishop outranks any other. The different titles point to the size and/or importance of their diocese.
Also, priests, archimandrites, hieromonks, archpriests, protopresbyters, protosyngellos, igumens, etc are all priests, and all have the same sacramental functions, but different administrative roles.
To be honest, I don't know what all the titles mean myself.
Post a Comment